Adaptation. I hate. Or a fairy tale about how for the sake of the life of a herd they donate a couple of heads
In the beginning it was not even a theater, but simply the gulbies of the people, when someone danced, someone sang, and someone just watched. As an example, I can cite one of many a holiday that have survived to our times – Shrovetide. There is a show. There are spectators. Conclusion – an example of a primitive theater.
Everyone remembers “The arrival of the train? 1896.”
And at the end they pulled themselves up
1949. Lonely ranger. And yes, it was he who recently shown in the cinema, but already in the form of a “full meter”
Remember Pong? But no. 1967. Ha ha. 1942.! Rocket simulator. In early 1947, a patent was filed for this type of program. Almost 2 years later, at the end of 1948, it was received. So the games, theoretically, even older than the series.
.
At the beginning of the movie, like the theater, were the unique creativity of authors and actors. Then a genius appeared, who offered the theaters to play a ready-made play, which only needs to be โprocessedโ for playing on stage, and the question of the film adaptation of novels, poems, plays and operas was already quite logical-sir, yeah.
I will give an example. From 1887 to 1927, 56 stories and 4 stories are written about the same hero. And he visited the cinema more than 210 times. M -dy. And yes! This number includes both cinema and cartoons (where the hero was not always a person and even changed the era of residence), and the series (mmm … My favorite Soviet series with comrade. Livanov. Yes, and modern with Benedict Cumberbatch is not bad). I will say only one thing about games. There are about 60 of them. Well, almost all of them are quests.
If anyone has not yet understood who it was, then it was about the greatest detective of Europe, and perhaps the world – Sir Sherlock Holmes.
Whether he was Sir – I don’t remember. Author, Sir Conan Doyle, was. Sherlock – I don’t know, but it looks more beautiful
So. We conducted a small educational program, now let’s move on to the problem.
There are three of them. But reality speaks differently – 1.25. Cool, yes? And if the first problem carries a serious character, then the second and third are more likely to be bloated from the void.
The first is the opportunity to recreate something literally (literally).
The second is Renaming (not sure of the existence of the word, but it means – renaming). There may be a problem that if the book is filmed, then there is already such a film. Or something like that. I will say anything about localization, especially our Russian, which are meaningless and merciless.
The third is political correctness, feminists, Greenpeace, church, censorship and other idiots. No. I do not consider feminists and Greenpeisers idiots! I consider the warlike “parishioners” of these groups by idiots. The same situation with the church.
1.
It will be very short here. When transferring the book to the film, you can encounter the problem of reconstruction of the effect and action. Since if our fantasy is endless, then the possibilities of cinema, even with the latest 3D programs.
2.1.
In the beginning I will say about the same 0.25%. Real problem. Who needs two films with the same name? Therefore, you can add some word like “incredible \ si \ or \ or \ si \ aya”. Well, or call it without relying on the original. For example. Stranger. So called the very first film. And yes. He was alone. Then strangers. And there were many of them. Then there was a number 3. Well, in the fourth film they added a word. Many years later, there was a case of not transferring to a new โplatformโ, but return (not a remake, but a combek). In order not to torment this word, they generally changed the name to “Prometheus”. Graceful, I think. By the way. There was such a film. AVH. Have not heard? Could you confuse it with something? Actually, even if the abbreviation is disclosed, you will still be aware that this is the same (alien vs. Hunter). So sometimes the change of name is quite justified, and sometimes someone specially drives his own under the โcoolโ original.
2.2.
But this already infuriates. Tell Casino non gamstop me. Why if a film with the name โIntouChablesโ has been released, then in Russia who decided to release it with the name 1+1. OK. Let’s check the coincidence. Um … There are six of them. That is, they decided not to add the 7th? Well done, but why 1+1? OK. This is not the most striking example. Ted. The third extra. Why? So that Russian spectators do not confuse this film from the 1995 TED release on the biography of Abraham Lincoln? I sleep and see how two friends met, and one is trying to prove to the other that it was he who saw the right new film yesterday. Scary? This is exactly what the localizers were probably frightened. But I would like to indicate the film that forced to write this text. “Telekinesis”. When I saw the first trailer, it was curious. But when the original name was shown at the end of the video, I was in shock. I could not read this book in view of the drowning of the phone a couple of months before this video appears. So why it was to change the name? What is that its name is similar to the name of earlier adaptation? Yes, the book is not about telekinesis at all. Yes, he is there, but he is actually not the main thing. I would understand the logic “Blood”, “Case on graduation” or “Revenge”. But the first and third have a bunch of similar films. But the second is free, yes! Take it, I don’t feel sorry.
OK. Enough.
3.
But now we have come to the quintessence of idiocy.
OK. 0.01 problems do not even make sense to remember. This is when, with the authorโs permission, they change the ending. And even he himself can write it. Sometimes. But when they begin to change the characters … it infuriates me. Well, what’s the difference – the white neighbor has the protagonist or black? Three soldiers enter the store or five? Damn it with the color of the dress, but the hell is the actress at all not like the original. I remember Carrie again (2013). Chloe Grace Motz. A demanded actress now. Yes. But she doesn’t look like Carrie at all. Okay hair, okay, but figure! Carrie was either hollow or complete, I donโt remember exactly, but Chloe in the trailer is thin. You can throw me with rotten foods, but it hurt me. We go further. When shooting each film, he has to go through a cloud of instances, and each will say “I don’t like it”. Damn tolerasts. Although no.
Then the scene is too cruel (I remember the film, where the scenarian man tried to sell the script, but with himself in the kit, but he was refused due to the scene with the murder of the dog, they said that it was cruel and unnecessary. And if he refuses, and he refused for a long time, then they will steal the script, slightly change, remove the dog and exhibit as his creation, and no one will remember the man. It seems that De Niro was also in that film.), then it is necessary to promote tolerance to the masses (hello interracial lesbians with a daughter in the “dome”, where there were neither lesbians nor blacks at all. Although one seemed to be. I don’t remember. But there is definitely a line that there were no blacks in that city, except for some soldier behind the dome or inside someone.). OK. Further. Why is Mother-Russia in the second “Mordoboy” short-haired blonde? Or they were afraid to offer a barbell to put on a wig? Or is it against her religion? Or black dreadlocks are unstressing? Rave. Damn with him with a suit. I will survive the replacement of the tattoo on the navel with two on the cups of the bra, who used to be a sports bra or something similar with the inscription of the USSR. And in general the comic was much more spectacular than the film. The first comic was along with the film in spectacular, and the second is clearly losing.
Crap. Looks like a frame from porn. And even the numbers hint!
Here you could still talk about the strange work of ratings in Russia, where for 16+ they are afraid to make a human translation at the level. Dmitry “Goblin” Puchkov, but I do not want to increase the size of this text by another third. It makes no sense. So many curses have been expressed to this problem. From myself, I will say that it is extremely rare to hear even a good translation in compliance with all the emotions of the heroes.
So that’s it. Hello!
The best comments
I looked at what “telekinesis” is. No, thanks. Better than the original 1976. After the โominous dead people, I am only for the original and the old, kind old -school horrors. “Black Book” I could not watch at all. This movie is disgusting to me at the physiological and psychological level. These are all the renovation of violence, the cuts of the tongue with a knife are large, sorry, my psyche is not so violated as to enjoy it. That I drank, that the destination, that the Black Book, was shot for some psychopaths. Snuff films in cinemas. Some are pleasing, but the majority is either nonsense, or removed for mentally ill people with large sawing off their legs and dismemberment. Where is another Hitchcock? Or I’m not there?
Bombanilo noble: 3
In general, everything is on the case. I am infuriated by softening or a strong change in endings in films from books. Well, itโs completely right. And the appearance of the heroes … do not care, the main thing is to keep the image and the atmosphere itself created by the character at the appropriate level.
I’m afraid to remind, but in all the adaptations – Carrie was shown as a very air girl.
But in the story, yes, it is described as: “A large and awkward girl”
I read an article on โmutationsโ in one other site in the adaptations of โDr. Jectera and Mr. Haidโ, and there it was very clearly shown.
And for me personally, the riding of the book is the “amulet of the earthly man”
Modern horrors are created not for frightening, but causing disgust. This has long been known. There will be no second Hitchcock, people have already forgotten what is the fear of waiting. Why? Because they no longer sit in line to the dentist, use anesthesia and go by entering paid dentists.
Yes Hitchcock no longer scares a modern viewer.
Holds in the tension, yes. With interest, mostly.
But scare?
This is the problem. It’s not horrors. But just stupidly snuff. Expectations, Sasaspens- Every person came across this- this is not only toothache. Exams, important meetings, first date- all these are expectations. Plus the instincts have not outlined their. There is where to play. But mainstream cinema is infinitely far from classical horrors in particular and from the genre in general, cheaper only, they cause laughter, and I have not seen copyright horrors for a long time.
Horror for me is primarily an atmosphere. Atmosphere of doom. That everything is bad. Sooner or later, something bad will happen. Each frame, each scene brings closer to an imminent terrible end. And not mischievous sawing with a saw.
The first saw was removed almost according to Hichkokovsky. Classically. Awesome thing. Two people are locked in the premises. Voltage. But the continuation is what they have, except for stupid meat?
Yes, no need.
Saw I – III – awesome films. I canโt call them horror films – I was not scared, but it was interesting.
But then the meat has already rushed for the sake of meat.
Yes, no need.
Saw I – III – awesome films. I canโt call them horror films – I was not scared, but it was interesting.
But then the meat has already rushed for the sake of meat.
Each has its own point of view when the Franchise drank slopped into shit-to-pipe meat for the mentally ill, but the fact remains. The rest is just srach.
This is true.
But still, I will not stop considering that in the shit drank slopped only after the third part. To the third – the ratio of “plot: meat” more inclined towards the plot.
In general, the biggest problem of adaptations is not a change in the appearance of the GG, but an attempt to make from some ancient work a relevant, stylish, fashionable and youth thing. Like miserable grinch, cat in a hat, Lorax, Horton. The creators of this forgot that the character should remain a character if Grinch is turned into Batman-Terminator-Dinosaurus (even so it will be better than Kerry in green latex), then he should be a character, no matter how his character is changed. He should not be lifeless shit for creating a film style. Of course, if you leave any character to the adapted character, you will not escape all the problems.